Zcom_simple

Iraq in Fragments



Source: Foreign Policy In Focus

Change Text Size a- | A+


"[W]hat lengths men will go in order to carry out, to their extreme limit, the rites of a collective self-worship which fills them with a sense of righteousness and complacent satisfaction in the midst of the most shocking injustices and crimes."
     -Love and Living, by Thomas Merton

On Wednesday, March 25, Major General David Perkins of the U.S. military, referring to how often the U.S. military was being attacked in Iraq, told reporters in Baghdad, "Attacks are at their lowest since August 2003." Perkins added, "There were 1,250 attacks a week at the height of the violence; now sometimes there are less than 100 a week."

While his rhetoric made headlines in some U.S. mainstream media outlets, it was little consolation for the families of 28 Iraqis killed in attacks across Iraq the following day. Nor did it bring solace to the relatives of the 27 Iraqis slain in a March 23 suicide attack, or those who survived a bomb attack at a bus terminal in Baghdad on the same day that killed nine Iraqis.

Having recently returned from Iraq, I experienced living in Baghdad where people were dying violent deaths on a daily basis. Nearly every day of the month I spent there saw a car bomb attack somewhere in the capital city. Nearly every day the so-called Green Zone was mortared. Every day there were kidnappings. On good days there were four hours of electricity on the national grid, in a country now into its seventh year of being occupied by the U.S. military, and where there are now over 200,000 private contractors.

Upon returning home, I experienced the disconnect between that reality, lived by roughly 25 million Iraqis, and the surreal experience of living in the United States - where most media pretend the occupation of Iraq is either not happening, or uses the yardstick of decreased U.S. military personnel deaths in Iraq as a measure of success. In the words of Major General Perkins, "If you take a look at military deaths, which is an indicator of violence and lethality out there, U.S. combat deaths are at their lowest levels since the war began six years ago." But it's a less useful metric when one looks at the broader picture inside of Iraq: the ongoing daily slaughter of Iraqis, the near total lack of functional infrastructure, the fact that one in six Iraqis remains displaced from their homes, or that at least 1.2 million Iraqis have died as a result of the U.S.-led invasion and occupation of their country.

Seventy-two months of occupation, with over $607 billion spent on the war (by conservative estimates), has resulted in 2.2 million internally displaced Iraqis, 2.7 million refugees, 2,615 professors, scientists, and doctors killed in cold blood, and 338 dead journalists. Over $13 billion was misplaced by the current Iraqi government, and another $400 billion is required to rebuild the Iraqi infrastructure. Unemployment vacillates between 25-70%, depending on the month. There are 24 car bombs per month, 10,000 cases of cholera per year, 4,261 dead U.S. soldiers, and over 70,000 physically or psychologically wounded soldiers.

There 's no normal life in Baghdad. While it's accurate and technically correct to say there is less violence compared to 2006, when between 100 and 300 Iraqis were slaughtered on a daily basis, Iraq resembles a police state more than ever. U.S. patrols consisting of huge, lumbering mine-resistant vehicles rumble down streets congested with traffic. It's impossible to travel longer than five minutes without encountering an Iraqi military or police patrol - usually comprised of pickup trucks full of armed men, horns and/or sirens blaring. Begging women and children wander between cars at every intersection. U.S. military helicopters often rumble overhead, and the roar of fighter jets or transport planes is common. There's no talk of reparations for Iraqis for the death, destruction and chaos caused by the occupation.

Neighborhoods, segregated between Sunni and Shia largely as a result of the so-called "surge" strategy, provide a blatant view of the balkanization of Iraq. Neighborhoods of 300,000 people are completely surrounded by 10-foot high concrete blast walls, rendering normal life impossible. The fear of a resurgence of violence weighs heavy on Iraqis, as the current so-called lull in violence feels tenuous, unstable, and possibly fleeting. Nobody there can predict the future, and to hope for a sustained improvement in any aspect of life feels naive, even dangerous.

The title of the film "Iraq in Fragments" by James Longley, which was nominated for Best Documentary Oscar at the 2007 Academy Awards, best describes Iraq today. The country has been destroyed by decades of U.S. policy that has plagued Iraqis. Looking back only to 1980, we see the U.S. government supporting both Iraq and Iran during their horrible eight-year war. In 1991 we see George H. W. Bush's war against Iraq, and his, Bill Clinton's, and George W. Bush's oversight of 12-and-a-half years of genocidal economic sanctions that killed half a million Iraqi children. Today, under President Barack Obama, what is left of Iraq smolders in ruins, with no real end of the occupation in sight.

All of the recent talk of withdrawal from Iraq is empty rhetoric indeed to most Iraqis, who see the giant "enduring" U.S. military bases spread across their country, or the U.S. "embassy," the size of the Vatican City, in Baghdad. The gulf between the rhetoric of withdrawal and the reality on the ground spans the distance between Iraq and the United States, while the reality is pressed in the face of the Iraqi people each day the occupation continues.

Person

PR

By notme, at Apr 19, 2009 14:11 PM

Since Helen's comment is written in a style that looks very much like the output of PR firms, it got me wondering a bit about what sort of 'contracting; she does.  The distortions of the English language by the US military in recent years has tended to associate the term 'contractor' with roles I would call 'mercenaries'.  But, there are lots of other types of 'contractors', and some of them involve professional PR work.   Found this little item from Aug, 2008.  (http://blogs.bnet.com/pr/?p=285)

"Got some extra time on your schedule? The U.S. Army is looking for a PR contractor to provide “information operations” support to the military in Iraq.

According to PRWeek:

Work for the account involves a wide range of communications activities, including monitoring and analyzing Arabic and Western media; spokesperson training; and development and dissemination of TV, radio, newsprint, and Internet “information” products, according to the RFP, originally issued by the Department of the Army’s Joint Contracting Command in late July.

 

The minimum amount for the one-year contract, with two, one-year options to renew, is set at $250,000, and the maximum amount is $300 million."

 

Note that the contract calls for both the 'monitoring of Western media', and also for the 'development and dissemination' of 'Internet "information" products.  Hmmm,  I wonder if that's what this comment is ... an 'Internet "information" product"?

 

Now, I have no idea who "Helen" is, or why she posted this.  I do know it smells more like a professional PR piece, with ready references to USA Today articles.   I know when I'm writing in comments, I don't always go to the research on the fly to look up stuff like that.  But her piece seems to have a lot of official facts and figures close at hand.   Part of why it just seems like a professional PR piece to me, and which got me wondering a bit about where it came from.

Reply this comment


Person

Who do I believe?

By notme, at Apr 19, 2009 13:35 PM

Hmmm, who do I believe?  An ex-military 'contractor' who does business in Iraq working apparently for contractors hired by the US government.  This is the only comment she's ever posted to ZNet, so apparently she signed on just to say this.  No history on Znet that makes anyone think there is any committment to causes like peace and justice.

Or, do I believe an independent journalist who's been reporting from Baghdad ever since soon after the war?  I have a long record of reading Dahr Jamail's comments from Baghdad, and have never found it to be untruthful.

Maybe we should go back and read the entire history of the last 6 years of so of what government sources like Helen have been telling us about Iraq, and also the entire history of what Mr. Jamail has been telling us about Iraq?  If we went back and did all that reading,  who do you think we would feel has been more truthful over time. 

I saw another sign today of what seems to be a deliberate campaign of mis-information about Iraq.  This came from the AP ...

"Suspected militants shelled Baghdad's protected Green Zone on Saturday in the first such bombardment in more than three months."

Really, Mr. Jamail says its nearly a daily occurence.  On my blog (commondebate@blogspot.com), I point out that every source in the AP article is a government source, and all but one is anonymous.

Which means, both Helen and the AP are helping to illustrate Mr. Jamail's main point.  That there is a huge gulf between what we think we know here about what's going on in Baghdad versus what he saw while he was really there.  If all of us could travel to Baghdad, we'd each know this personally.  That what the Helen's of this world are saying is very, very different from what we'd see and feel if we were there.  Since I can't travel there personally, I have to be very thankful to Mr. Jahail for his doing so and for the many excellent reports he's sent back to us over the years.

Well, I hope whichever contracting form that 'Helen' works for paid ZNet some money to be able to post their propaganda here.

Reply this comment


The user who created this comment no longer exists.

Loading_border